Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Is Freedom Salve Enough To Cure What Ails the Globe?

When GW suggested that he was engaged in the defining ideological struggle of the 21st century, he wasn’t kidding. If you take a look at his address delivered today at the UN, it’s riddled with unbridled rhetoric designed…wel l, to do what?

When W suggest that to the UN General Assembly that

This great institution must work for great purposes — to free people from tyranny and violence, hunger and disease, illiteracy and ignorance, and poverty and despair. Every member of the United Nations must join in this mission of liberation.

two things strike me: 1) Is this enough to fix what ails the globe? And 2) Isn’t this what the UN technically is already supposed to be doing?

Really, if freedom is the salve that cures situations such as Iraq, how long should we give it? Is our model for spreading freedom the right model?

If “spreading freedom” is your aim, might there be another, more effective way to do it than raining death upon a nation in the name of said freedom?

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • Reddit

One Response to “Is Freedom Salve Enough To Cure What Ails the Globe?”

  1. Welcome back.

    I’ll only discuss one item on this:

    Isn’t this what the UN technically is already supposed to be doing?

    If the UN spent it’s time in doing what Bush said, and not in trying to destroy Israel, maybe the UN would actually have some relevance.

Leave a Reply

Fish.Travel